Malicious Belford Lawsuit

I can bet you could not have guessed the new vampires ‘on the block’ when it comes to creating unnecessary speculations and irrelevant accusations or having come across spineless lawsuits ! in the recent times every passing day you have got it already? Yes, I am talking about none other than the nonsensical law firms, in particular the one that goes by the name of Googasian P.C. who has dared to file a class action against a leading online life experience awarding high school – Belford, their new scapegoat.

For your information, Googasian P.C. is a law firm of small stature recently set up and their only claim to fame is a case where they have lately won a gigantic $ 5 million against a university within the boundaries of their hometown. Since then they cannot seem to get enough of the chance of generating easy revenue on the expense of defaming reputable education bodies like Belford due to which they have stooped down to the level of launching a website reserved solely for this purpose.

Googasian P.C. irresponsibly claims that ‘Belford sells unaccredited diplomas’ and that ‘profit schools offering education to adults with High School diplomas and GEDs are big business in the United States’. To begin with, let us assure you that Belford cannot possibly be accused as yet another ‘profit school in the US’ as it is accredited by not just one but two prestigious accreditation agencies for on-line education, the International Accreditation Agency for Online Universities (IAAOU) and the Universal Council for Online Education Accreditation (UCOEA).

Astoundingly Googasian P.C. has not even hot and bothered to look up their case closely enough to have missed such a prominent point that Belford does not even function under the US jurisdiction in the first place. Their week homework on the Belford case only suggests as to how they are in for some more easy bucks this time round too.

Besides, they have not even vaguely surfed Belford’s official website as yet and had the nerves to file a class action against the institution as had they done so, it would have both saved them time and effort as Belford’s Terms & Conditions and even the information given on the TOS page of its official site only works in the favor of Belford even if by the farthest of chance Googasian P.C. does manage to prove it to be a body operating in the US.

Googasian P.C. should therefore be held responsible for wasting the court’s time and efforts on a case not even structured well enough to be further presented, let alone be won.